Most people's ego is kicking in, when you tell them they don't have free will. I think it will take a whole while for society to catch up. But why do you even need the acceptance of society?

Amy wrote:

Sanshi wrote:

Most people's ego is kicking in, when you tell them they don't have free will. I think it will take a whole while for society to catch up. But why do you even need the acceptance of society?

It's not about acceptance..I say if we all would consciously use LOA it would be difficult to manifest specific relationship because that person would be intentionally createing what he wants

Oh yeah, I see. I didn't read properly and was thinking about the moral thing.
So you say right now, people have no free will, because they don't know about LoA, but if they knew about LoA they had free will and LoA wouldn't longer work properly and you couldn't longer have what you want or one would lose? Sounds pretty confusing to me. I like my version of reality more.
 

Amy wrote:

People don't have free will in sense that free will,desicions are based on what we are feeling is right to do..and feeling and believes come from subconscious..and on subconscious level we are influencing others and others are influencing us. Lets' say you are using loa to get Joe. But Joe is also aware that he is creator of his life so he is using loa to get  Mary. In that case it is hard to manifest relationship with Joe because he is intentionaly manifesting relationship with Mary.  I guess in that situation the one who will manifest is the one who has stronger vibrational alingment

I claim that in this case, I get Joe and Joe gets Mary and all are happy in their own relationship as long as they are aligned with it. Competition is an illusion.

Amy wrote:

Sanshi wrote:

I claim that in this case, I get Joe and Joe gets Mary and all are happy in their own relationship as long as they are aligned with it. Competition is an illusion.

Even if you want to be with Joe all your life and he wants to be with Mary all his life?

Yes. That's the logical implication of "everyone creates their own reality", isn't it? Else it would be "everyone creates a part of their own reality" and then I don't need LoA. I had that before. I could choose to which school to go, what to study, what to do in my freetime. So I already created parts of my reality.

Amy wrote:

It is..but something can't be black and white at the same time in the same sense...I've never seen monogamos relationship where you are with Joe while he is with Mary...if you get me...you can't use LOA on contradictions, some biological or physical universal principles; not getting older,living forever, physically traveling trough time,being  with Joe after he dies..
I think you can get Joe,absolutely, but have to be aligned more than he is to be with Mary
Maybe somebody on this forum can resolve this? :D

The problem is that you try to integrate LoA in your old view of the world and that can't work. As you see, it leads to paradoxes at some point. You have never seen a monogamous relationship where I'm with Joe while he is with Mary, because your senses just allow you to tune into one reality at one time. You see the reality you expect or think is more likely, but that doesn't mean that the other version of reality doesn't exist simultaneously. There is really no lack in this universe, not even lack of Joe.

And how can you know that it's impossible to not getting older or travel through time? I'm pretty sure you have never tried to change that beliefs, right? I'm sure it is possible. But the question is, if you are able to believe in it.